Monday, February 10, 2014

The following is Blog post number twelve, and is part of the continuing series Racial Reconciliation in America: in honor of Black History Month. It is entitled: The Predicate of Fear

RACIAL RECONCILIATION

THE PREDICATE OF FEAR

“And when the woman saw that the tree was good for food, and that it was pleasant to the eyes, and a tree to be desired to make one wise, she took of the fruit thereof, and did eat, and gave also unto her husband with her; and he did eat.” (Genesis 3:8) KJV.

I so love Holy Scripture. Everything associated with human behavior for me is made plain and discoverable within Holy Scripture the Bible. The third chapter of the Book of Genesis in the Holy Bible has been a fascination to me from my youth. In my transitioning to maturity I am impressed mainly with how wrong and intentionally wrong Holy Scripture has been communicated! Yea, for me it is troubling how often Scripture has been used by man for vicious and sinful purposes both in antiquity and today. It is a tragedy when folk are duped so easily by their desires and sloth into believing misinterpretations of Holy Scripture.
After the so-called fall of man; since the beginning the woman has borne the weight of guilt in the world. Actually the weight has always been rooted in the choice made by the man. The man who just happened to be in charge at the time of decision chose disobedience, over his personal responsibility to the commandment of the Creator. The man knew that he was in charge and given charge over all things in the earth!
More often than not this story (this particular verse), is told without acknowledging one very important word. That word is “with”! The story is usually misinterpreted as though the woman was alone at the time in the Garden of Eden with the deceiving serpent. For centuries folk have been deceived into thinking that the serpent convinced her of the beauty and power of the fruit; then she (in some clandestine manner of secrecy) took the forbidden fruit and gave it to her man.
Historically in conveying the message and this story, a perception endures that the woman tricked her husband into eating the fruit forbidden them by God. We are persuaded that this is just one example of setting an agenda and using Holy Scripture to prove what is actually a lie. In this classic example – that the woman Eve was the cause of the man Adam’s sin and thus the entire so-called “Fall of Man!”
Of course the ultimate strategy being to image the female creature as: weak devious disobedient and inferior to the male. To this we say bullshit. Yes this is the appropriate word of description, carrying the proper weight of outrage. Both were disobedient and both heard the commandment of God. Simple as that!
As it relates to equality equal, although the man being the first creation of human life; with the woman being made from his bones: the man was given the greater responsibility of the administration of God’s will. So in this regard the truth of the story is that it was the man Adam who was actually responsible and accountable for the “Fall of Man” and not the woman Eve. That is why it was a man Jesus Christ not a woman who bore the suffering and performed the redemptive sacrifice to correct that which Adam spoiled. That being the human’s relationship with the entire universe!
Genesis chapter three is so powerful for understanding human emotion. By way of example, we ask: where do the emotions of fear and resentment – two of the most powerful human emotions by the way; where do they come from?  We believe that both emotions have a common root and that root is guilt. Accurate interpretation of Genesis chapter three clarifies for us that the emotion of guilt produces fear and vice versa.
When the Creator, came looking for his creation, it was both fear and guilt that we see in the story. “Adam where art thou” (3:9) the response: “And he said, I heard thy voice in the garden, and I was afraid, because I was naked; and I hid myself” (3:10). In this picture we see three emotions that are displayed: fear, guilt and shame.
All of these emotions are connected. All of them are rooted in either fear or guilt. We are persuaded that “I was afraid” is a picture of the most profound emotion borne by the human being then and now. Fear is what courage must overcome. Fear leads to many of our greatest human failings. Action that produces fear brings about the domination of the human spirit; fear is the principle tool that man uses to conquer most domains.
 Actions declare choice. Choices put into action produce results that are viewed as consequences; whether positive or negative human emotions carry the power of our choice. Choices plus actions equal results, or what we call consequences. We are persuaded that consequences ending in fear will lead to guilt and then shame.
If guilt goes unresolved an emotional state that is called resentment will set in; stays there until the root of beginnings have been destroyed. This entire process is held in and frames part of what we know as our human subconscious, which [Webster’s Dictionary defines as: “subconscious: existing in the part of the mind that a person is not aware of: existing in the mind but not consciously known or felt.”]
An act that produces guilt cannot be allowed to go unresolved for if there were no sin in the act it will likely lead to sinfulness that is the result of resentment; this is what unresolved guilt produces. It is very likely that a guilt producing act was in actuality an act of sin. The first human act that gives us a picture of guilt and shame and what is produced by fear is Genesis 3:9-10. Shame is the picture we see in the statement: “I was naked” “I hid.”
Because of his fear Adam did not take responsibility for his disobedience, his sin. Adam blamed his wife for his own sin. Not to mitigate the role of Eve who was also wrong in her choice, but it was Adam that the Creator had put in charge of creation. Adam was “with” the woman and Adam was engaged in the entire matter. We dare say that men have blamed women for many of their bad choices ever since.
The most consequential and fundamental result of this Book of Genesis story really has to do with the outcome of human disobedience. The act let us recall began with the first and only “do not” commandment of the Creator to the creation. As it is written: “But of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, thou shalt not eat of it: for in the day that thou eatest thereof thou shalt surely die.” (Genesis 2:17) KJV.
This Scripture tell us that originally the human being did not have nor was supposed to have a conscience. This we find to be most fascinating! We also see from this Scripture that from the beginning the human being was destined for an eternal life. That is still available. But as to a conscience, this is obviously a feature that humans did not need or originally come with as a creation.
Now, Co-Knowledge –  two kinds of information if you will, is essentially the definition of conscience. Co: meaning two and Science meaning knowledge, in other words the knowledge’s: good and evil. "Death" meant that the human being would become knowledgeable of evil for they were already walking with good.
That is to say they were walking with God. Genesis 3:9-10 as we have seen, explains what happens when the human gets in touch with evil: it was to for the first time know fear; then guilt; then shame and eventually there will come resentment!
"Death" meant that there would be a separation from God. Will God allow evil to touch God? NO! "Death" also meant that the covering the humans were originally clothed with; that had immediately vanished by their disobedience, was likely the same covering as what God was clothed with.
We are told earlier in the Book that the human was created in the image of God and most likely because of God’s continual presence a blinding light type covering was the result. This perhaps causing the human’s to not see their nakedness. The power of God’s actual physical presence may have caused a longer human life as other Scripture often suggests?
            But let us get back to the important point here, which leads us to the discussion of this current hour and Racial Reconciliation in America. The human beings by their disobedience acquired a conscience. [Here is the online dictionary definition of: con•science noun \ˈkän(t)-shən(t)s\ : the part of the mind that makes you aware of your actions as being either morally right or wrong : a feeling that something you have done is morally wrong Full Definition of CONSCIENCE 1 a : the sense or consciousness of the moral goodness or blameworthiness of one's own conduct, intentions, or character together with a feeling of obligation to do right or be good b : a faculty, power, or principle enjoining good acts  c : the part of the superego in psychoanalysis that transmits commands and admonitions to the ego 2 archaic : CONSCIOUSNESS  3 : conformity to what one considers to be correct, right, or morally good : CONSCIENTIOUSNESS  4 : sensitive regard for fairness or justice : SCRUPLE — con•science•less adjective — in all conscience or in conscience : in all fairness]
          By their actions the human beings actually brought evil and the knowledge of doing both right and wrong into the earth. We are told in the Book that God cursed them both. This turned them against one another. Now we do not imagine a different manner of human conduct than what humans have displayed.
        We only know what to us history has revealed. Over the process of unfolding time what we see in looking at human history is how the human being has subdued the earth. Our predicate is the Book of Genesis.
Human history shows us that the male has subdued the earth with what can only be described as an ungodly brutality. The man has used the tools of a before unnecessary conscience: fear guilt shame and resentment; along with his propagation of religion, i.e. by only allowing man to posses the responsibility to communicate religious traditions and edicts. History speaks to us in results: that this has been done for the purpose of male domination.
History shows us that the human species has developed in other words moved through time in this fashion: the male with brutish physicality – through which he has subdued all the elements of survival; with religiosity – through which he has dominated hearts, bent and controlled minds unto his own, will.
The female has transitioned through time in this fashion: by surviving the male through whatever means necessary including manipulation – through which she has been able to both survive and even conquer the male with mental cunning, sexual acuity, birthing the species and training her offspring. What history reveals to us is the picture of the man and woman given to us in the Book of Genesis. And this is the established human behavioral predicate and a lens for viewing humans through time. We have a lens that allows us to see how the human condition unfolded spiritually, emotionally and psychologically.
The lens and this predicate are important as we view the current unrest in America. This lens is the American conscience. What we will see and understand is how a collective conscience of a nation has produced today's severe racial problem. We will understand how to fix this problem through a process of racial reconciliation. What we will dissect is a seared national conscience hindering our urgent discussion of race.

No comments:

Post a Comment